Skip to content

How Australia’s Media Forgot its Own Approach to Covering One Nation

Three decades ago, Pauline Hanson’s brand of politics was so shocking, aberrant and dangerous that it made the front page of The Washington Post. This week, Australian journalists gave her the softest run any politician has had in recent memory.

Three decades ago, Pauline Hanson’s brand of politics was so shocking, aberrant and dangerous that it made the front page of The Washington Post.

The year was 1998 and the Post was still an American newspaper of record. Hanson’s photo was worth printing on the front page, because something momentous had happened: after being discounted by most of the Australian media, One Nation had reached its highest ever polling at the time. The paper described her and her party as “ultranationalist”.

The term sticks out because today, no major media organisation uses labels like “ultranationalist” or even “far-right” to describe One Nation’s politics.

Keep reading

This story is for Lamestream subscribers

Lamestream is an independent media outlet. We're backed by our readers, not billionaires. Become a subscriber and get access to:

  • Every story and exclusive, plus our archive
  • Ad-free episodes of the podcast every Monday and Thursday
  • Our weekly newsletter
  • Pre-sale tickets to our live events, and discounts
  • Our Discord community, and much more!

Latest